July 10, 2009

Informed Passion

From Pastor Dan

I admit it, I cruise ministry blogs often. It’s one way that I keep up with what’s happening in the “church catholic” (the universal Christian church around the world), make new ministry connections, and also how I gather resources for our own local church. While on one such “cruise” I bumped into this little phrase used to describe a worship resource: “Informed Passion”. (you can visit this resource here)

It jumped off the screen at me and made me immediately think of what we are trying to do here at SHF. We don’t want “uninformed passion” where a worship service is “red hot” but nobody really knows why. And we certainly don’t want “informed non passion”, where the worship content is all proper and orthodox but nobody seems to care (think – yawning through Amazing Grace).

No, we strive for informed passion. We want to be increasinglyinformed about the gospel so that we will respond with much passionfor the Savior!

June 28, 2009

Bono on Jesus

Want to know what the lead singer of one of the greatest rock bands of all time thinks about Jesus? Read on…

Via:Z

A few years ago a book was released called Bono In Conversation, by Michka Assayas. Gene Veith wrote an article for World Magazine that commented on a very interesting section of the book where Bono basically witnesses to the interviewer.

Gene Edward Veith writes:

Is Bono, the lead singer and songwriter for the rock group U2, a Christian? He says he is and writes about Christianity in his lyrics. Yet many people question whether Bono is “really” a Christian, due to his notoriously bad language, liberal politics, and rock star antics (though he has been faithfully married for 23 years). But in a new book of interviews, Bono in Conversation by Michka Assayas, Bono, though using some salty language, makes an explicit confession of faith.

The interviewer, Mr. Assayas, begins by asking Bono, Doesn’t he think “appalling things” happen when people become religious? Bono counters, “It’s a mind-blowing concept that the God who created the Universe might be looking for company, a real relationship with people, but the thing that keeps me on my knees is the difference between Grace and Karma.”

The interviewer asks, What’s that? “At the center of all religions is the idea of Karma. You know, what you put out comes back to you: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, or in physics — in physical laws — every action is met by an equal or an opposite one,” explains Bono. “And yet, along comes this idea called Grace to upend all that…Love interrupts, if you like, the consequences of your actions, which in my case is very good news indeed, because I’ve done a lot of stupid stuff.”

The interviewer asks, Like what? “That’s between me and God. But I’d be in big trouble if Karma was going to finally be my judge,” says Bono. “It doesn’t excuse my mistakes, but I’m holding out for Grace. I’m holding out that Jesus took my sins onto the Cross, because I know who I am, and I hope I don’t have to depend on my own religiosity.”

Then the interviewer marvels, “The Son of God who takes away the sins of the world. I wish I could believe in that.”

“The point of the death of Christ is that Christ took on the sins of the world, so that what we put out did not come back to us, and that our sinful nature does not reap the obvious death,” replies Bono. “It’s not our own good works that get us through the gates of Heaven.”

The interviewer marvels some more: “That’s a great idea, no denying it. Such great hope is wonderful, even though it’s close to lunacy, in my view. Christ has His rank among the world’s great thinkers. But Son of God, isn’t that farfetched?”

Bono comes back, “Look, the secular response to the Christ story always goes like this: He was a great prophet, obviously a very interesting guy, had a lot to say along the lines of other great prophets, be they Elijah, Muhammad, Buddha, or Confucius. But actually Christ doesn’t allow you that. He doesn’t let you off that hook. Christ says, No. I’m not saying I’m a teacher, don’t call me teacher. I’m not saying I’m a prophet. I’m saying: ‘I’m the Messiah.’ I’m saying: ‘I am God incarnate’…So what you’re left with is either Christ was who He said He was — the Messiah — or a complete nutcase…The idea that the entire course of civilization for over half of the globe could have its fate changed and turned upside-down by a nutcase, for me that’s farfetched.”

What is most interesting in this exchange is the reaction of the interviewer, to whom Bono is, in effect, witnessing. This hip rock journalist starts by scorning what he thinks is Christianity. But it is as if he had never heard of grace, the atonement, the deity of Christ, the gospel. And he probably hadn’t. But when he hears what Christianity is actually all about, he is amazed.


June 27, 2009

On Singing The Psalms

Justin Nale shares why we should sing the Psalms but not only the Psalms…

5 Reasons I Believe Churches Should Sing the Psalms

1. The Bible tells us to.

2. The Book of Psalms is the only hymnbook in which every song is infallible and inerrant.

3. Related to #2, could any other songs have a better author?

4. The Psalms help us to sing and celebrate all God’s attributes, unlike our modern hymns which tend to focus on just a few.

5. Singing the Psalms helps us to memorize them and hide them in our hearts.

5 Reasons I Don’t Believe that Churches Should Sing Only the Psalms.

1. The Psalms tell us to sing new songs.

2. The Bible tells us to sing songs other than the Psalms. (And I do not buy the argument that “psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs” refers only to those types of songs in the Psalms.)

3. Those who sing only the psalms never get to sing the name of Jesus.

4. Related to #3, those who sing only the psalms never get to sing the kinds of songs that the saints in heaven sing.

5. The New Testament church appears to have sung songs other than the Psalms. Most scholars think that Colossians 1:15-20 and Philippians 2:5-11 are examples of hymns that were sung by the early church.

June 24, 2009

Free Online Books from Monergism

By clicking here, you can find a large amount of free online books from Monergism.

June 11, 2009

Rain City Hymnal… Free

This from Tim Smith

I’m excited to announce the official launch of ReSound.org. First of all, thank you to everyone who spread the word and downloaded our introductory sampler last week. Special thanks to all those we met at the Advance 09 conference in Durham, North Carolina. It was a privilege to be there and lead you in song.

Today we release our first full-length album, the Rain City Hymnal. It’s a collection of modern arrangements of 12 hymns by 5 different Mars Hill bands and represents our most ambitious project to date. These old songs represent the essence of our task in corporate worship: combining an ancient message of truth in music for a particular people, time, and place.

At the Resurgence we love to offer resources to encourage and build up the church. So for a very limited time, we are offering the Rain City Hymnal exclusively through Noise Trade. Through our friends at Noise Trade you can choose to either pay what you want for the album or download it for free in exchange for helping spread the word about our music. You can also embed the widget in your blog or website and help spread the word even further.

Visit Re:Sound, check out the Rain City Hymnal, tell your friends, and help spread the word. Let us know what you think on Twitter at @ReSoundMusic. As always, stay tuned to the Resurgence for more information on the Rain City Hymnal and many more projects in the months to come.

June 8, 2009

Sam Storms free for Kindle

Source: Crossway blog

The Hope of Glory: 100 Daily Meditations on Colossians by Sam Storms (February 2008) is available for free for 30 days in the Kindle Store. Storms is also the author the recently released More Precious Than Gold: 50 Daily Meditations on the Psalms.

May 28, 2009

One reason God created singing and poetry

John Piper says this over at the Desiring God blog

In the Religious Affections Jonathan Edwards ventures this explanation of why there is song and poetry.

And the duty of singing praises to God, seems to be appointed wholly to excite and express religious affections. No other reason can be assigned, why we should express ourselves to God in verse, rather than in prose, and do it with music, but only, that such is our nature and frame, that these things have a tendency to move our affections.

For this to have the weight it does for Edwards we need to remember that 1) “true religion consists very much in the affections,” and 2) there is no true Christian faith without the affections being awakened, and 3) God is most glorified when he is affecting us and not just known by us.

May 28, 2009

Second thoughts on Pro-choice

via z

David Harsanyi is an atheist columnist for the Denver Post. He says he practices “moral relativism regularly”, but recently has struggled with the logic of holding to the pro-abortion choice position.

He writes in his column:

After a life of being pro-choice, I began to seriously ponder the question. I oppose the death penalty because there is a slim chance that an innocent person might be executed and I don’t believe the state should have the authority to take a citizen’s life. So don’t I owe an nascent human life at least the same deference? Just in case?

You may not consider a fetus a “human life” in early pregnancy, though it has its own DNA and medical science continues to find ways to keep the fetus viable outside the womb earlier and earlier.

But it’s difficult to understand how those who harp about the importance of “science” in public policy can draw an arbitrary timeline in the pregnancy, defining when human life is worth saving and when it can be terminated.

The more I thought about it, the creepier the issue got.

Newsweek, for instance, recently reported that 90 percent of women whose fetuses test positive for Down syndrome choose an abortion. Another survey showed only a small percentage of mothers even used the test. So what happens when 90 percent of parents test their fetuses? Does it mean the end of the disease or are we stepping perilously close to eugenics?

What about future DNA tests that can detect any “defects” in a fetus? What happens when we can use abortion to weed out the blind, mentally ill, the ugly, or any other any “undesirable” human being?

Recently, Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare ruled that women are permitted to abort their children based on the sex of the fetus. In the United States, a woman can have an abortion for nearly any reason she chooses. In fact, a health exemption for the mother allows abortions to be performed virtually on demand.

If you oppose selective abortions, but not abortion overall, I wonder why? How is terminating the fetus because it’s the wrong sex any worse than terminating the fetus for convenience’s sake? The fate of the fetus does not change, only the reasoning for its extinction does.

Now, I happen to believe (as the civil libertarian and pro-life activist Nat Hentoff once noted) that the right to life and liberty is the foundation of a moral society. Then again, I also believe a government ban on abortion would only criminalize the procedure and do little to mitigate the amount of abortions.

Obviously, these are a few of the complex and uncomfortable issues to ponder. So maybe this poll tells us that the dynamics of the abortion debate are about to change, that Americans are getting past the politics and into the morality of the issue.

Then again, it’s entirely possible that I’m just projecting.

Read the whole thing.

In reference to his second to last paragraph where he says that banning abortion would do “little to mitigate the amount of abortion”, this is just blatantly false. Does anyone really believe this? Does anyone really think that having laws against stealing doesn’t make someone think twice before they shatter my car window to try and get my stereo? Would you really want to say that laws against stealing to little to mitigate the amount of stealing in our country?

But even if we grant that it is true, do we throw off all legal restraint against domestic abuse because we know that it will certainly occur even though there are laws against it? Of course not. We don’t make laws based on how we think people will behave. Our laws should reflect what is right and wrong and should seek to be a deterrent for those whose will leads them to want to do wrong.

May 25, 2009

Who wouldn’t get saved…

Just follow the simple steps found here. (with pictures)

May 22, 2009

Keeping Up

I’ve been thinking a lot about “keeping up” lately. My family has been dealing with a decision that would change a lot of things for each one of us. In the end… when presented with all the pros and cons with each option… it largely comes down to keeping up. I don’t want to lead my family in a life of “keeping up”.

Now, for clarity sake, let me say, as far as the decision my family is facing, I am not making the conclusion that the same is true for all other families.
This is completely a personal conviction.

I found the quotes below to be helpful (although as far as I can tell, neither the interviewer nor the interviewee had my situation in mind).

They are from an interview with Paul Tripp over at the Desiring God blog

I read a book on stress a few years back, and the author made a side comment that I thought was so insightful. He said that the highest value of materialistic western culture is not possessing. It’s actually acquiring.

If you’re a go-getter you never stop. And so the guy who is lavishly successful doesn’t quit, because there are greater levels of success. “My house could be bigger, I could drive better cars, I could have more power, I could have more money.”

And so we’ve bought an unbiblical definition of the good life of success. Our kids have to be skilled at three sports and play four musical instruments, and our house has to be lavish by whatever standard. And all of that stuff is eating time, eating energy, eating money. And it doesn’t promote community.

I think often that even the programs of a local church are too sectored and too busy. As if we’re trying to program godliness. And so the family is actually never together because they’re all in demographic groupings. Where do we have time where we are pursuing relationships with one another, living with one another, praying with one another, talking with one another?

… You can’t fit God’s dream (if I can use that language) for his church inside of the American dream and have it work. It’s a radically different lifestyle. It just won’t squeeze into the available spaces of the time and energy that’s left over.

… All that stuff has to be maintained. It grabs your heart, it grabs your schedule, it grabs your time. It becomes a source of worry and concern and need to pay.